Liberty Itch

Liberty Itch

Share this post

Liberty Itch
Liberty Itch
Brave New World Wide Web

Brave New World Wide Web

Liberty Itch's avatar
Liberty Itch
Feb 13, 2024

Share this post

Liberty Itch
Liberty Itch
Brave New World Wide Web
Share

The reverse correlation between the internet’s growing accessibility and its diminishing freedom can only be arrested by changes in user habits

Much has been made of the ACMA ‘misinformation bill’ and its potential impact on free speech online in Australia. But the internet hasn’t been a bastion of free expression for quite some time now, and like always, it ultimately comes down to choice and the power of the consumer. 

Prior to the rise of social media giants such as YouTube, Facebook and Twitter/X, the internet was largely a decentralised hub of independent content, websites, blogs and message boards. It was something of a wild west – not as easy to navigate or as accessible as it is today. 

The market responds to genuine economic incentives far more than it does to vitriolic comments online.

Speech online was regulated not by law as much as in-house moderation, which sought primarily to improve the user experience. Google search functioned properly, as your search terms would deliver you to websites or listings which were actually relevant. Anonymity online was a key tenet of staying safe – people were actually encouraged to separate their online and offline lives. 

This has now been replaced or superseded. Mostly gone are the volunteer admins of message boards – automated or paid moderation teams on large sites such as YouTube now ban users with no remit and apply terms and conditions selectively. Google search has descended into a bidding war for top place between AI-generated SEO-optimised junk listicles that attract clicks but ultimately waste your time (hint – use Reddit instead). 

As for anonymity, KYC (know your customer), verification ticks and ID verification on account of frauds and criminals have largely taken care of that. Even Bitcoin, created to store wealth and transact outside the traditional finance system, has instead limped into Wall St via ETFs as dreams of mass adoption turned to mass investment by the very institutions it sought to subvert. 

Alternatives exist, of course: you can source your news and editorials from independent publications like this one, or via Substack and other such platforms. You can even support creators directly who can no longer exist on YouTube or Facebook via platforms such as Rumble or Locals.

But we often don’t – it takes extra time, extra money, extra effort. Just like acting to protect our freedoms offline – we could use cash more, we could avoid supermarkets and shop local, we could live off-grid. 

Speech online was regulated not by law as much as in-house moderation, which sought primarily to improve the user experience.

Ultimately, our collective need for security and convenience has allowed larger players to create monopolies in online spaces. As the internet has become more centralised and increased traffic (ie revenue) flows to the major players, we have subsequently seen an alarming but unsurprising partnership between ‘big tech’ and government develop. One that has sought to suppress free expression and crush competition.    

We have largely allowed the same offline of course. It’s not just government either – consider the extra restrictions and occasional obstacles we face when transferring money from bank accounts for certain purposes. This is at least in part due to the collective risk of scams and fraud that is being passed on as a reduction in the ability to transact freely.   

Achieving political, cultural or economic change which protects or expands freedom requires you to act, not just to think, not just to post online. 

Join Mailing List

The market responds to genuine economic incentives far more than it does to vitriolic comments online. 

As with the internet, when demand for security and convenience grew, the market adjusted. Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World perfectly described a society that had sleep-walked willingly into dystopia by simply having their base needs and comforts met conveniently. 

We mustn’t follow a similar pattern.  So don’t just demand freedom — create demand for freedom!       

The post Brave New World Wide Web appeared first on Liberty Itch.


Subscribe to Liberty Itch

Launched 7 months ago
fearless, battle-tested, libertarian ideas

Share this post

Liberty Itch
Liberty Itch
Brave New World Wide Web
Share

Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ep11: Censored for Conspiracy Theories - James Corbett
Watch now |
Apr 18 • 
Damon Hayhow
 and 
The Corbett Report
98

Share this post

Liberty Itch
Liberty Itch
Ep11: Censored for Conspiracy Theories - James Corbett
12
57:42
Differentiate or Drop Dead
My inbox and DMs are a cesspool of Liberal Party cry babies, snivelling over the election’s crushing verdict.
May 6 • 
Kenelm Tonkin
16

Share this post

Liberty Itch
Liberty Itch
Differentiate or Drop Dead
10
Where Eagles Soar
I grew up in regional Queensland.
Jan 5 • 
Jim Willmott
17

Share this post

Liberty Itch
Liberty Itch
Where Eagles Soar
3

Ready for more?

© 2025 Liberty Itch
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Create your profile

User's avatar

Only paid subscribers can comment on this post

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in

Check your email

For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.

Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.