I understand the concern, but there are moral values which, if followed, lead to objectively better outcomes for society. Similarly, there are values which, if followed, objectively lead to the fragmentation and desecration of functioning society.
We should be advocating the former regardless of whether that may sometimes increase the size and scope of government.
This is probably a topic worthy of its own article. However, I think a succinct example of something, which followed, has desecrated functioning society is the gender madness.
To enable mental illness and allow people to mutilate their healthy bodies is a societal failure that has led to objectively worse outcomes. The libertarian response, while somewhat nebulous, typically opposes the chemical castration and genital mutilation of children but permits adults to do as they wish. In my opinion, this is an insufficient response.
Well, if only it were the God-fearing libertarians and conservatives that wanted their morality enforced by government.
I understand the concern, but there are moral values which, if followed, lead to objectively better outcomes for society. Similarly, there are values which, if followed, objectively lead to the fragmentation and desecration of functioning society.
We should be advocating the former regardless of whether that may sometimes increase the size and scope of government.
Which moral values, if followed, lead to objectively better outcomes for society, James?
This is probably a topic worthy of its own article. However, I think a succinct example of something, which followed, has desecrated functioning society is the gender madness.
To enable mental illness and allow people to mutilate their healthy bodies is a societal failure that has led to objectively worse outcomes. The libertarian response, while somewhat nebulous, typically opposes the chemical castration and genital mutilation of children but permits adults to do as they wish. In my opinion, this is an insufficient response.